References for: Christianity and the Mathematical Sciences - the Heliocentric Hypothesis


Version for printing
Books

  1. D Alexander, Rebuilding the matrix (Oxford, 2001).
  2. A Bönker-Vallon, Metaphysik und Mathematik bei Giordano Bruno (Berlin, 1995).
  3. J Dillenberger, Protestant thought and natural science (London, 1960).
  4. A Funkenstein, Theology and the Scientific Imagination (Princeton, 1986).
  5. R Hooykaas, Religion and the rise of modern science (Edinburgh, 1973),
  6. D C Lindberg and R L Numbers, God and Nature (Berkeley, 1986).
  7. P Machamer (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Galileo (Cambridge, 1998).
  8. J Polkinghorne, One World : the Interaction of Science and Theology (Princeton, 1987).
  9. J Polkinghorne, The Faith of a Physicist : The Gifford Lectures for 1993-4 (Princeton, 1994).
  10. E Rosen, Copernicus and his successors (London, 1995).
  11. B Russell, History of Western Philosophy (London, 1961).
  12. H Shapley, Science Ponders Religion (New York, 1960).
  13. G Simon, Kepler-astronome, astrologue (Paris, 1979).
Articles

  1. R Blackwell, Could there be another Galileo case?, in The Cambridge companion to Galileo (Cambridge, 1998), 348-366.
  2. W C Charron and J P Doyle, On the self-refuting statement "There is no truth": a medieval treatment, Vivarium 31 (2) (1993), 241-266.
  3. F Dyson, Review of Feynman and of Polkinghorne "Belief in God in an Age of Science", New York Review of Books (28 May, 1998).
  4. I Grattan-Guinness, Historical notes on the relations between mathematics and the Christianities, Meeting of Austrian Society for the History of Mathematics (Spring, 1999).
  5. S Knuuttila and A I Lehtinen, Change and contradiction: a fourteenth-century controversy, Synthese 40 (1) (1979), 189-207.
  6. F Krafft, Astronomie als Gottesdienst : Die Erneuerung der Astronomie durch Johannes Kepler, in Der Weg der Naturwissenschaft von Johannes von Gmunden zu Johannes Kepler (Vienna, 1988), 182-196.
  7. M Lejbowicz, Logique, mathématiques et contre-acculturation dans l'université médiévale, in La nouvelle physique du XIVe siècle, Nice, 1993 ( Florence, 1997), 203-229.
  8. E McMullin, Galileo on science and Scripture, in The Cambridge companion to Galileo (Cambridge, 1998), 271-347.
  9. M Pera, The god of theologians and the god of astronomers : an apology of Bellarmine, in The Cambridge companion to Galileo (Cambridge, 1998), 367-387.
  10. B Pizzorno, Some logical aspects of the drama of Galileo (Italian), Physis-Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci. 20 (1-4) (1978), 271-283.
  11. E Rosen, Calvin's attitude towards Copernicus, Journal of the History of Ideas 21 (1960), 431-441.
  12. E Rosen, Kepler and the Lutheran attitude towards Copernicus, Vistas in Astronomy 18 (1975), 225-231.
  13. E Rosen, Was Copernicus' Revolutions approved by the Pope, Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (1975), 531-542.
  14. E Rosen, Galileo's misstatements about Copernicus, Isis 32 (1958), 319-330.
  15. J von Plato, Nicole Oresme and the ergodicity of rotations, Acta Philos. Fenn. 32 (1981), 190-197.
  16. R S Westfall, The trial of Galileo: Bellarmino, Galileo, and the clash of two worlds, J. Hist. Astronom. 20 (1) (1989), 1-23.
  17. G Zimmermann, Die Gottesvorstellung des Nicolaus Copernicus, Studia Leibnitiana 20 (1) (1988), 63-79.

JOC/EFR February 2002

The URL of this page is:
http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/HistTopics/References/Heliocentric.html